Nan Hua Qi Huo

Search documents
集装箱运输市场日报:期价相对维稳-20250814
Nan Hua Qi Huo· 2025-08-14 10:18
集装箱运输市场日报 source: 南华期货 【核心矛盾】 今日集运指数(欧线)期货各月合约价格整体延续震荡走势。截至收盘,除EC2510合约略有回落,其 余各月合约价格均略有回升。从交易所排名前20大机构持仓增减去看,EC2510合约多头减仓1871手至30074 手,空头减仓2243手至33647手,交易量减少38234手至39080手(双边)。在此前接连下降后,大部分合约 已至短期低位,部分空头止盈离场,市场交易情绪也相对偏冷静,故今日期价有所回升。对于后市而言,当 前期价已逐渐接近现舱报价水平,预计EC整体延续震荡走势的可能性相对较大;从中期来看,如无突发性事 件因素影响,基于基本面考量,整体期价走势可能仍略偏回落。 【利多解读】 以色列总理内塔尼亚胡在接受i24新闻采访时暗示将大幅扩张以色列边界,这一表态立即在阿拉伯国家和 领导人中引发新一轮争议与愤怒。在这段最新发布的采访中,内塔尼亚胡表示自己正在执行一项"历史与精神 使命",并明确表达了对"大以色列"愿景的强烈认同——这一概念长期以来被用来指代包含约旦、埃及和叙利 亚部分领土,以及被占领的约旦河西岸和加沙地带在内的以色列版图。这一言论发表之际,正 ...
南华商品指数:贵金属板块上涨,黑色板块领跌
Nan Hua Qi Huo· 2025-08-14 10:18
Report Information - Report Name: Nanhua Commodity Index Daily Report [2] - Date: August 14, 2025 [2] - Author: Nanhua Index Group, including Cao Yanghui, Zhao Bo, and Wang Yilin [2] Investment Rating - No investment rating information is provided in the report. Core View - According to the closing prices of adjacent trading days, the Nanhua Composite Index declined by -0.81% today. Among the sector indices, only the Nanhua Precious Metals Index rose by 0.02%, while the rest of the sectors declined. The sector with the largest decline was the Nanhua Black Index, down -1.56%, and the sector with the smallest decline was the Nanhua Non-Ferrous Metals Index, down -0.63%. All theme indices declined, with the Black Raw Materials Index having the largest decline of -1.99% and the Economic Crops Index having the smallest decline of -0.04%. Among the single-variety indices of commodity futures, the caustic soda index had the largest increase of 1.26%, and the rapeseed meal index had the largest decline of -3.05% [1][3][4]. Index Performance Summary Composite and Sector Indices - Nanhua Composite Index (NHCI): Closed at 2534.95, down -0.81% from the previous close of 2555.72, with an annualized return of 0.35% and an annualized volatility of 13.73% [3]. - Nanhua Precious Metals Index (NHPMI): Closed at 1261.11, up 0.02% from 1260.91, with an annualized return of 29.51% and an annualized volatility of 16.60% [3]. - Nanhua Industrial Products Index (NHII): Closed at 3650.38, down -0.89% from 3683.10, with an annualized return of -6.10% and an annualized volatility of 16.15% [3]. - Nanhua Metal Index (NHMI): Closed at 6464.57, down -1.02% from 6531.47, with an annualized return of 1.60% and an annualized volatility of 14.94% [3]. - Nanhua Energy and Chemical Index (NHECI): Closed at 1681.16, down -0.70% from 1693.04, with an annualized return of -12.75% and an annualized volatility of 18.40% [3]. - Nanhua Non-Ferrous Metals Index (NHNF): Closed at 1713.87, down -0.63% from 1724.76, with an annualized return of 5.63% and an annualized volatility of 13.41% [3]. - Nanhua Black Index (NHFI): Closed at 2582.71, down -1.56% from 2623.70, with an annualized return of -8.58% and an annualized volatility of 21.92% [3]. - Nanhua Agricultural Products Index (NHAI): Closed at 1113.19, down -0.86% from 1122.89, with an annualized return of 5.55% and an annualized volatility of 9.53% [3]. - Nanhua Mini Composite Index (NHCIMi): Closed at 1191.43, down -0.91% from 1202.38, with an annualized return of 3.23% and an annualized volatility of 14.63% [3]. - Nanhua Energy Index (NHEI): Closed at 1058.07, down -1.05% from 1069.32, with an annualized return of 2.54% and an annualized volatility of 29.87% [3]. - Nanhua Petrochemical Index (NHPCI): Closed at 945.19, down -0.85% from 953.29, with an annualized return of 0.75% and an annualized volatility of 15.28% [3]. - Nanhua Coal Chemical Index (NHCCI): Closed at 1036.33, down -1.00% from 1046.83, with an annualized return of 1.17% and an annualized volatility of 17.17% [3]. - Nanhua Black Raw Materials Index (NHFM): Closed at 1067.01, down -1.99% from 1088.67, with an annualized return of 7.32% and an annualized volatility of 23.31% [3]. - Nanhua Building Materials Index (NHBMI): Closed at 763.35, down -0.72% from 768.87, with an annualized return of 3.25% and an annualized volatility of 23.12% [3]. - Nanhua Oilseeds and Oils Index (NHOOI): Closed at 1287.05, down -1.18% from 1302.40, with an annualized return of 3.74% and an annualized volatility of 10.27% [3]. - Nanhua Economic Crops Index (NHAECI): Closed at 910.15, down -0.04% from 910.49, with an annualized return of 1.89% and an annualized volatility of 5.65% [3]. Theme Indices - All theme indices declined, with the Black Raw Materials Index having the largest decline of -1.99% and the Economic Crops Index having the smallest decline of -0.04% [4] Single-Variety Indices - The caustic soda index had the largest increase of 1.26%, and the rapeseed meal index had the largest decline of -3.05% [1][4] Contribution to Index Movements - For the Nanhua Composite Index, positive contributors included soda ash (4.15%), while negative contributors included zinc (-1.52%), aluminum (-1.80%), and PVC (-1.98%) [8] - For the Nanhua Mini Composite Index, positive contributors included soda ash (7.44%), while negative contributors included zinc (-32.55%), aluminum (-1.80%), and PVC (-1.98%) [8] - For the Nanhua Industrial Products Index, positive contributors included soda ash (4.69%), while negative contributors included iron ore (-1.68%), crude oil (-1.61%), and zinc (-1.67%) [8] - For the Nanhua Metal Index, positive contributors included caustic soda (2.54%), while negative contributors included tin (-6.52%), aluminum (-3.51%), and zinc (-3.51%) [8] - For the Nanhua Energy and Chemical Index, positive contributors included soda ash (7.47%), while negative contributors included crude oil (-16.62%), iron ore (-19.37%), and PVC (-9.11%) [8] - For the Nanhua Agricultural Products Index, positive contributors included cotton (1.45%), while negative contributors included rapeseed meal (-17.58%), palm oil (-22.79%), and soybean meal (-14.26%) [8] Other Information - The calculation of price changes is (today's closing price - yesterday's closing price) / yesterday's closing price, and the contribution is the product of price change and weight [11] - The Nanhua Commodity Index excludes the price difference when changing commodity contracts, reflecting the real return of investing in commodity futures [11] - The contribution calculation method used is: a variety's daily price change / ∑|all varieties' daily price changes|, with yellow data bars indicating a daily increase and blue data bars indicating a daily decrease [11]
股指日报:压力线生效,股市冲高回落-20250814
Nan Hua Qi Huo· 2025-08-14 10:17
股指日报 股指期货日报 2025年8月14日 王映(Z0016367) 投资咨询业务资格:证监许可【2011】1290号 压力线生效,股市冲高回落 市场回顾 | | IF | IH | IC | IM | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 主力日内涨跌幅(%) | -0.02 | 0.48 | -1.00 | -0.95 | | 成交量(万手) | 15.3749 | 8.709 | 11.2146 | 26.5731 | | 成交量环比(万手) | 2.6975 | 2.0405 | 0.5277 | 3.6064 | | 持仓量(万手) | 27.1876 | 10.4724 | 21.5557 | 36.5293 | | 持仓量环比(万手) | 0.5578 | 0.3248 | -0.9652 | -0.6229 | source: wind,南华研究 股指日报现货市场观察 今日股指继续放量下跌,大盘指数展现韧性。从资金面来看,两市成交额大幅回升1282.72亿元。期指方面, IF放量下跌,IH放量上涨,IC、IM缩量下跌。 重要资讯 1、中国平安和旗下资产管理公司平 ...
国债期货日报:风险情绪仍占主导-20250814
Nan Hua Qi Huo· 2025-08-14 10:17
Report Summary 1. Investment Rating No investment rating for the industry is provided in the report. 2. Core View - The bond market may experience an inertial decline in the short - term, and long - term bonds are likely to see larger drops due to high trading congestion. Traders should not short, but can bet on oversold rebounds, and those holding long positions should set stop - losses [1][3]. 3. Content Summary by Section 3.1.盘面点评 - On Thursday, bond futures prices declined across the board. The yields of spot bonds rose, and the yields of medium - and long - term bonds continued to rise after the futures market closed. The open - market operation had a net withdrawal of 3.2 billion yuan, but the liquidity was loose, with DR001 at 1.317% [1]. 3.2.日内消息 - US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent urged the Federal Reserve to cut interest rates by 150 basis points or more, starting with a 50 - basis - point cut in September. - The weighted winning bid yields of the 3 - year and 20 - year national bonds issued by the Ministry of Finance were 1.42% and 2.0596% respectively [2]. 3.3.行情研判 - The bond market did not react to the previous day's social financing data. In the morning, it was suppressed by the A - share market breaking through 3,700 points. Although the stock market declined in the afternoon, the bond market still had weak rebound momentum. The A - share market may start to adjust, but whether the bond market can benefit depends on the adjustment range and time [3]. 3.4.数据一览 - **Futures Prices and Changes**: TS2509 closed at 102.35, down 0.02 from the previous day; TF2509 closed at 105.685, down 0.065; T2509 closed at 108.345, down 0.115; TL2509 closed at 117.82, down 0.49 [4]. - **Contract Positions**: TS contract positions decreased by 895 to 101,985; TF contract positions decreased by 1,970 to 175,039; T contract positions decreased by 5,864 to 231,061; TL contract positions decreased by 3,204 to 149,892 [4]. - **Basis and Trading Volume**: The basis and trading volume of each contract also showed corresponding changes. For example, the TS basis (CTD) decreased by 0.0201 to 0.0195, and the trading volume increased by 113 to 39,613 [4]. - **Funding Rates**: DR001 was 1.3164%, up 0.0002 from the previous day; DR007 was 1.4522%, up 0.0078; DR014 was 1.4816%, up 0.0128 [4].
南华原木产业风险管理日报-20250814
Nan Hua Qi Huo· 2025-08-14 10:17
南华原木产业风险管理日报 2025年8月14日 宋霁鹏(投资咨询证号:Z0016598 ) 投资咨询业务资格:证监许可【2011】1290号 原木价格区间预测 | | 价格区间预测(月度) | 当前波动率(20日滚动) | 当前波动率历史百分位(3年) | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 原木 | 820-860 | 16.28% | 67.4% | source: 南华研究 原木套保策略表 | 行为导 | 情景分析 | 现货敞 | 策略推荐 | 套保工 | 买卖方 | 套保比例 | 建议入场 | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 向 | | 口 | | 具 | 向 | (%) | 区间 | | 库存管 理 | 原木进口量偏高库存高位,担心价格 下跌 | 多 | 为了防止存货叠加损失,可以根据企业的库存情况,做空原木期货来锁定利润, 弥补企业的生产成本 | lg2509 卖出 | | 25% | 850-875 | | 采购管 | 采购常备库存偏低,希望根据订单情 | | 为了防止原木价格上涨而抬升采购成本,可以在目 ...
油料产业风险管理日报-20250814
Nan Hua Qi Huo· 2025-08-14 05:11
Report Summary 1. Report Industry Investment Rating No relevant content provided. 2. Core Viewpoints - The planting weather of US soybeans in the outer market remains favorable, showing a weak trend; the downside space of the near - term contracts of the domestic soybean system is limited, and the market is gradually shifting to price the supply - demand gap logic of the far - term contracts; the rapeseed system has strengthened in the short term due to the relief of its own warehouse receipt pressure [4]. - There is a strong bullish sentiment for the far - term contracts under the supply - demand gap, and the export premium of Brazilian soybeans supports the price of the far - term contracts from the cost side [9]. 3. Summary by Related Catalogs 3.1 Oil Price Range Forecast - The price range of soybean meal in the next month is predicted to be 2800 - 3300, with a current 20 - day rolling volatility of 10.2% and a 3 - year historical percentile of 7.8%. The price range of rapeseed meal is 2450 - 2750, with a current 20 - day rolling volatility of 12.7% and a 3 - year historical percentile of 7.2% [3]. 3.2 Oil Hedging Strategy | Behavior Orientation | Spot Exposure | Strategy Recommendation | Hedging Tool | Buying/Selling Direction | Hedging Ratio (%) | Suggested Entry Interval | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Trader Inventory Management | Long | Short soybean meal futures according to enterprise inventory to lock in profits and make up for production costs | M2601 | Sell | 25 | 3300 - 3400 | | Feed Mill Procurement Management | Short | Buy soybean meal futures at present to lock in procurement costs | M2601 | Buy | 50 | 2850 - 3000 | | Oil Mill Inventory Management | Long | Short soybean meal futures according to enterprise situation to lock in profits and make up for production costs | M2601 | Sell | 50 | 3100 - 3200 | [3] 3.3 Core Contradictions - The outer - market US soybean planting weather is favorable and shows a weak trend; the near - term contracts of the domestic soybean system have limited downside space, and the market is pricing the far - term supply - demand gap; the rapeseed system strengthens due to the relief of warehouse receipt pressure [4]. 3.4 Bullish and Bearish Interpretations - Bullish factors: The basis has rebounded due to some oil mills' shutdowns, and the downside space for the subsequent spot - futures convergence of the 09 contract is limited. The soybean arrivals are expected to have a gap after December. The near - term rapeseed meal is stronger than soybean meal due to warehouse receipt issues, and the far - term rapeseed supply has uncertainties leading to accelerated marginal destocking [5][6]. 3.5 Oil Futures Prices | Variety | Closing Price | Daily Change | Daily Change Rate | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Soybean Meal 01 | 3072 | 7 | 0.23% | | Soybean Meal 05 | 2762 | 11 | 0.4% | | Soybean Meal 09 | 3026 | 3 | 0.1% | | Rapeseed Meal 01 | 2463 | 24 | 0.98% | | Rapeseed Meal 05 | 2402 | 15 | 0.63% | | Rapeseed Meal 09 | 2745 | 21 | 0.77% | | CBOT Yellow Soybeans | 990.5 | 0 | 0% | | Off - shore RMB | 7.1868 | 0.0026 | 0.04% | [6] 3.6 Soybean and Rapeseed Meal Spreads | Spread Type | Value | Change | | --- | --- | --- | | M01 - 05 | 310 | - 4 | | M05 - 09 | - 264 | 8 | | M09 - 01 | - 46 | - 4 | | RM01 - 05 | 61 | 9 | | RM05 - 09 | - 343 | - 6 | | RM09 - 01 | 282 | - 3 | | Soybean Meal Rizhao Spot | 2900 | - 30 | | Soybean Meal Rizhao Basis | - 126 | - 33 | | Rapeseed Meal Fujian Spot | 2562 | 11 | | Rapeseed Meal Fujian Basis | - 162 | - 35 | | Soybean and Rapeseed Meal Spot Spread | 338 | - 30 | | Soybean and Rapeseed Meal Futures Spread | 281 | - 18 | [10] 3.7 Oil Import Costs and Crushing Profits | Import Item | Price (Yuan/ton) | Daily Change | Weekly Change | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | US Gulf Soybean Import Cost (23%) | 4655.5086 | 29.7162 | - 0.0771 | | Brazilian Soybean Import Cost | 3970.92 | 8.71 | 38.09 | | US Gulf (3%) - US Gulf (23%) Cost Difference | - 756.9933 | 2.162 | 12.6856 | | US Gulf Soybean Import Profit (23%) | - 724.9886 | 29.7162 | 136.5096 | | Brazilian Soybean Import Profit | 106.2403 | - 25.7061 | 0.5465 | | Canadian Rapeseed Import Futures Profit | 296 | 86 | 218 | | Canadian Rapeseed Import Spot Profit | 479 | 104 | 238 | [10]
南华期货锡风险管理日报-20250814
Nan Hua Qi Huo· 2025-08-14 03:30
Report Information - Report Title: Nanhua Futures Tin Risk Management Daily Report - Date: August 14, 2025 - Research Team: Nanhua Non - ferrous Metals Research Team [1] Investment Rating - Not provided in the report Core View - Tin prices declined slightly on Wednesday, with limited macro influence. On the supply side, the repeated postponement of the full resumption of production in Myanmar's tin mines has significantly supported tin prices and may have a continuous impact. The unexpected impact of the production cut at Bisie tin mine in Alphamin's financial report has pushed up short - term tin prices. There is no significant change in demand [3] Summary by Section 1. Tin Price Volatility and Risk Management - **Tin Price Volatility**: The latest closing price is 269,820 yuan/ton, the monthly price range forecast is 245,000 - 263,000 yuan/ton, the current volatility is 14.36%, and the current volatility's historical percentile is 26.1% [2] - **Risk Management Suggestions**: - **Inventory Management**: For high - level finished product inventory worried about price drops, it is recommended to sell 75% of Shanghai Tin main futures contracts at around 275,000 yuan/ton and sell 25% of SN2510C275000 call options when volatility is appropriate [2] - **Raw Material Management**: For low - level raw material inventory worried about price increases, it is recommended to buy 50% of Shanghai Tin main futures contracts at around 230,000 yuan/ton and sell 25% of SN2510P245000 put options when volatility is appropriate [2] 2. Factors Affecting Tin Prices - **Lidofactors**: Sino - US tariff policy easing, the semiconductor sector still in the expansion cycle, and Myanmar's resumption of production falling short of expectations [7] - **Negative Factors**: Repeated tariff policies, the inflow of Myanmar's tin mines into China, and the slowdown of the semiconductor sector's expansion speed and shift from the expansion cycle to the contraction cycle [5] 3. Tin Futures Market Data - **Daily Futures Data**: - **Shanghai Tin**: The main contract, continuous - one contract, and continuous - three contract prices are 269,820 yuan/ton, 269,820 yuan/ton, and 269,950 yuan/ton respectively, with no daily change [6] - **LME Tin 3M**: The price is 33,700 US dollars/ton, down 70 US dollars (- 0.21%) [6] - **Shanghai - London Ratio**: The ratio is 7.95, down 0.03 (- 0.38%) [6] 4. Tin Spot Market Data - **Weekly Spot Data**: The prices of Shanghai Non - ferrous tin ingots, 1 tin premium, 40% and 60% tin concentrates, and various types of solder bars have increased to varying degrees [14] 5. Tin Import and Processing Data - **Daily Import and Processing Data**: The tin import profit and loss is - 15,720.3 yuan/ton, down 5.17% with a daily increase of 856.65 yuan. The processing fees for 40% and 60% tin ores remain unchanged [17] 6. Tin Inventory Data - **Daily Inventory Data**: The total warehouse receipt quantity of tin in SHFE is 7,430 tons, up 0.45% (33 tons). The LME tin inventory is 1,765 tons, up 0.86% (15 tons) [20]
南华期货铜风险管理日报-20250814
Nan Hua Qi Huo· 2025-08-14 03:24
source: 南华研究,同花顺 铜风险管理建议(日度) | 行为导向 | 情景分析 | 现货敞口 | 策略推荐 | 套保工具 | 买卖方向 | 套保比例 | 建议入场区间 | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 库存管理 | 产成品库存偏高,担心价格下跌 | 多 | 做空沪铜主力期货合约 | 沪铜主力期货合约 | 卖出 | 75% | 82000附近 | | | | | 卖出看涨期权 | CU2510C82000 | 卖出 | 25% | 波动率相对稳定时 | | 原料管理 | 原料库存较低,担心价格上涨 | 空 | 做多沪铜主力期货合约 | 沪铜主力期货合约 | 买入 | 75% | 77000附近 | | | | | - | - | - | - | - | 南华期货铜风险管理日报 2025年8月14日 南华有色金属研究团队 肖宇非 投资咨询证号:Z0018441 投资咨询业务资格:证监许可【2011】1290号 铜价格波动率(日度) | 最新价格 | 价格区间预测(月度) | 当前波动率 | 当前波动率历史百分位 | | --- | - ...
金融期货早评-20250814
Nan Hua Qi Huo· 2025-08-14 02:29
金融期货早评 宏观:多因素促使人民币贷款减少 【市场资讯】1)中国 7 月新增社融 1.16 万亿元,人民币贷款减少 500 亿元,M2-M1 剪刀 差缩小。央行主管媒体:不宜过度炒作单月信贷增量波动。2)特朗普表示可能稍微提前任 命下任美联储主席,人选缩小到三四位。贝森特:美国利率水平应比当前低 150 到 175 个 基点,9 月降息 50 个基点的可能性很大,对美联储主席人选"广撒网"至 11 位。美联储主 席潜在人选布拉德:若当选,将寻求打破"团体思维"。3)美财长"特普会"前施压,威胁加 大对俄制裁,特朗普称,若顺利将美俄乌三方会晤。4)芝加哥联储主席古尔斯比:需要看 到更多通胀好转的证据,每次会议都有行动的可能;美联储理事提名人米兰:没有证据表 明关税引发通胀。目前交易员已完全定价美联储 9 月份将降息 25 个基点。 【核心逻辑】国内方面,决策层密集出台了一系列民生、促消费政策,也让市场对后续政 策充满期待。从长远来看,民生、消费政策仍有较大发力空间。当前政策推进的方向明确 且契合民生需求,但需求的修复难以一蹴而就,仍需等待各项政策形成合力并逐步释放效 能。经济数据显示,经济边际有下行压力,若未 ...
铁合金产业风险管理日报-20250814
Nan Hua Qi Huo· 2025-08-13 23:30
铁合金价格区间预测 | | 价格区间预测(月度) | 当前波动率(20日滚动) | 当前波动率历史百分位(3年) | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 硅铁 | 5300-6000 | 25.65% | 69.0% | | 硅锰 | 5300-6000 | 15.48% | 28.5% | source: 南华研究,同花顺 铁合金产业风险管理日报 2025/8/13 陈敏涛(Z0022731 ) 投资咨询业务资格:证监许可【2011】1290号 铁合金套保 | 行为导 | 情景分析 | | 现货敞 | 策略推荐 | 套保工具 | 买卖方 | 套保比例(%) | 建议入场区间 | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 向 | | | 口 | | | 向 | | | | 库存管 | 产成品库存偏高,担心铁合金下 | | 多 | 为了防止存货跌价损失,可以根据企业的库存情况,做空铁合金 | SF2509、SM | 卖出 | 15% | SF:6200-6250、SM:6 | | 理 | | 跌 | | 期货来锁定利润 ...